“As a board, we recognise and acknowledge that every founder’s personal identity is deeply intertwined with that of the company they build, particularly after a 30-year journey in WiseTech’s case. The board also acknowledges that the media attention deeply affected the company, its reputation and some team members.”

The company successfully passed all the resolutions at the meeting, including its remuneration report, despite the Australian Shareholders’ Association recommending shareholders vote against it.

WiseTech told investors last month that White would take a brief break before taking up a “full-time, long-term consulting role” where he will be paid the same annual salary – $1 million – that he received as chief executive.

It followed an investigation by The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Australian Financial Review, which revealed White paid for a multimillion-dollar house for an employee and had been accused by an outgoing WiseTech Global director of intimidation and bullying.

At present, WiseTech is being led by interim chief executive Andrew Cartledge, who on Friday said he would not be a candidate for the role on a permanent basis. The board has tapped executive search firm Russell Reynolds to search internally and externally for White’s replacement.

Dammery said on Friday that a review led by law firms Herbert Smith Freehills and Seyfarth Shaw LLP into White’s conduct remained ongoing but so far had not found impropriety by White, including no issues relating to relationship disclosures or improper use of company funds. The firms have interviewed 21 people in 31 interviews and were probing allegations that White failed to disclose personal relationships to the board and misused company funds.

WiseTech said Seyfarth Shaw found “White made disclosures as required under relevant policies” and there was “no evidence that any required matters have not been disclosed to the board”.

“Seyfarth Shaw are further satisfied that the close personal relationships set out in White’s disclosures were in each instance previously disclosed or known to relevant WiseTech officers and senior managers.

“Seyfarth Shaw considered expense claims by White and identified no evidence of inappropriate use of company funds.”

The review also dismissed bullying claims, finding that White had a “direct approach” that was consistent with the process of “creative abrasion”, which created value for the organisation but could also be confronting and uncomfortable for others. The review remains ongoing.

Loading

WiseTech, which provides logistics software, downgraded its revenue outlook for FY25, which the board said was related to the controversies surrounding White.

It now anticipates FY25 revenue of between $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, compared with $1.3 billion and $1.35 billion in previous guidance.

The board’s decision to hold the AGM virtually – as it has done previously – angered the Australian Shareholders’ Association, and chairman Dammery said the company would adopt a hybrid model from 2025.