In one recent match, play stopped for several minutes while the Bunker pondered the staggeringly insignificant question of whether the ball, after being kicked into the air, had illegally brushed the pinkie of an attacking player on the way down.

The tape was played over and over, as if it were the Zapruder film. Maybe, if you rewatched it often enough, evidence of the microscopic infraction would reveal itself.

After all, the technology to do this exists. Therefore it must be used.

If that’s the argument, why not send a CSI team onto the paddock to dust the ball for prints? If utter certainty is the goal, let’s get David Caruso out there to do some DNA swabs.

Fanaticism, said George Santayana, consists in redoubling your efforts when you have forgotten your aim. Somehow Santayana came up with this line without ever seeing a Bunker referee in action. In their quest to enforce the rules with subatomic precision, the video refs seem to forget what the rules are for.

Surely they exist so that play can generally be got on with. If a player breaks them in a way that’s visible to the naked eye, in real time, that’s an offence. Otherwise, play on.

Video refereeing puts the cart before the horse. These days, play is constantly being suspended so that enforcement of the rules can be got on with.

Life is messy. Sport isn’t. Or anyway it shouldn’t be.

Why do we watch sport in the first place? Because it’s a heightened version of life. In sport, as in life, there are goals, striving, disappointment, ecstasy. But in sport, the lulls and complications are edited out. Life is messy. Sport isn’t. Or anyway it shouldn’t be.

Take soccer. The object of the game is beautifully simple. Get the ball into the opposition’s net. This is very hard to do. So when your team finally does it, it’s time to go unequivocally off your nut.

Loading

But wait! Not so fast. Put your frenzied celebrations on ice. Some unseen bureaucrat is speaking into the referee’s earpiece. It seems the goal you’ve so rashly allowed yourself to feel happy about may not be a goal after all.

Now the referee is walking towards the sideline. There’s an alfresco TV set over there. The referee starts watching replays of the goal on it. Many, many replays.

The players stand around on the field, talking among themselves while 40,000 fans in the stadium twiddle their thumbs. They’d thought they were there to see a soccer match. Instead, they’re looking at a guy in a bright yellow shirt watching a very small TV.

Time passes. Glaciers melt. Eventually, the referee either awards the goal or erases it from history.

Either way, the moment of jouissance has been lost. One of life’s most straightforwardly glorious experiences – the experience of seeing your team bang one into the onion bag – has been fundamentally altered. A goal isn’t a goal any more. It’s something that may or may not become a goal in about four minutes’ time.

Next time around, you won’t make the mistake of celebrating so much, or at all. Sport is becoming more and more like real life, and not in a good way.

Things don’t have to be like this. If we’re smart enough to invent the technology, we’re also smart enough to decide whether it’s working for us. If it isn’t, we have the power to get rid of it. We can always bring it back, if we find that we miss it. I don’t think we will.